New Money Super PAC to Build GOTV Army

New Money Super PAC to Build GOTV Army for Conservatives
By: Aaron Gardner (Diary) | June 2nd, 2014 at 03:00 PM | 5

New SuperPACs seem to sprout up all the time, but one that brings new money to the conservative movement, and has a focus on ground operations rather than campaign ad wars, is worth noting.

Vote 2 Reduce Debt (V2RD) announced they will be targeting 11 United States Senate races this fall and they are already actively engaged in three states prior to tomorrow’s June 3rd primary elections in IA, CO and MT. The PAC is taking on two issues that get right to heart of conservative anger toward the establishment: out of control federal spending by government, coupled with the waste, fraud and abuse of the consultant class that resulted in an almost non-existent ground game during the 2012 election cycle.

It’s a big lift. The PAC’s national political strategist, Patrick Davis, a personal friend and the former National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) Political Director who led the GOP to victory the last time Republicans wrested control of the US Senate back from the Democrats back in 2004.

Now, he’s coordinating the 11 state victory strategy for Vote 2 Reduce Debt by focusing on the nuts and bolts of political campaign, door knocking, phone banking and grassroots rallies designed to reinvigorate a base that has felt ignored, as well as to attract new voters to the cause by delivering a message that resonates with most people. “As we have been in the field leading into Tuesday primary elections, we’ve been able to identify that the federal debt is an eighty-percent issue, meaning that 80% of conservatives believe that the debt and economic issues are their top priority today.” Davis said.

The overwhelming national debt and how it will impact generations to come was the catalyst for Mr. Ken Davis of Ft. Worth Texas to decide to engage in the political process.

Ken Davis (no relation to Patrick Davis), who is highly regarded and very successful businessman, decided that after years of focusing his efforts in the private sector, he wanted to do something of vital importance for future generations: leave them with a secure nation, and ensure they are not saddled with insurmountable debt and the accompanying tax burden.

His commitment to the PAC as its founder and funder has led to the PAC’s ability to help such conservatives as Joni Ernst (IA), Cory Gardner (CO), and Rep. Steve Daines (MT) as they vie for republican US Senate nominations. According to Patrick Davis, “First we are influencing primaries in order to insure that the right candidates are nominated, then, with a conservative field secured we make the case to the base and broader conservative population.”

According to V2RD, there are approximately 26 million self-identified Christian conservatives who did not feel impelled to vote in the last election cycle or two. That group of disaffected conservatives is a major focus for the PAC’s turn out efforts.

Randy Hill , the PAC’s president, is a successful entrepreneur and businessman who is not a politician, something that may resonate well with conservatives fed up with Washington establishments pandering rhetoric. By pairing Randy Hill, a successful businessman, with Patrick Davis, the last political director to win back the US Senate for the GOP, V2RD may have the right recipe for appealing to the base in 2014 and 2016. If there are two things conservatives are fed up with, they are gluttonous government and losing

You can see more from V2RD on its twitter and facebook pages.

Community Organizing on the Right

September 17th, 2013 No comments

The Disconnect Between Outrage and Action

And how the Democrats bridged the divide to win elections



Americans are outraged.

The front page of the Washington Post recently told the story of an elderly man whose home was sold right out from underneath of him by the government due to a tax lien for a measly $134 dollars.  This elderly man was left with nothing.  Americans are outraged about this man’s plight and the similar fate of the countless others his story represents.

In other news, Congress decided that it would accept President Obama’s healthcare waiver thereby exempting themselves and their staff from Obamacare.  Worst still, the very agency tasked with enforcing Obamacare, the Internal Revenue Service, has requested an Obamacare waiver for their employees.  Americans are outraged by the uneven application of law, with Congress and regulators assuming a position above the laws they foist on the American people.

U.S. unemployment numbers are dismal with fewer Americans participating in the labor force than any time since 1978.  Sixty-seven percent of Americans want to see the Keystone XL pipeline approved in order to address rising energy costs yet President Obama and his allies are ignoring the vast majority of the population and blocking this vital energy lifeline.  Americans are outraged that the President and his allies are immune to the pain Americans feel as energy costs cause price escalations everywhere from the gas pumps to the grocery stores.

All of these problems existed last year well before the election.  Yet, for all the outrage, there has been no turn over in the one place where the outrage should have had an effect – the election booth.

How is it that so many people are outraged and yet the President was re-elected and the House and Senate leadership remained unchanged?

There is a disconnect between outrage and action.  The reason is simple.  Politically center-right leaning Americans who are outraged by Obamacare, a lack of domestic energy production, etc., are mainstream, employed, tax payers with responsibilities.  They take to social media to vent their frustration in extraordinary numbers, but without some infrastructure to support their viewpoint, without leadership and tools, they are not able to fully harness that frustration and turn it into focused action.  On the flip side, there are people who take to the streets without much infrastructure in order to vent their political frustration – people like those who slept in tents and made their own political materials like the Occupy Wall Street protestors.  Those protestors are unemployed, or with few responsibilities, and tend to be radical to the point of being easily dismissed.

In order to be truly successful, a movement needs two things: credible participants and credible leadership.

The answer is grassroots development in the form of community organizing.  People who sneer at community organizing don’t understand what it is.  It’s the low-tech, plodding, methodical, and unglamorous — but vitally important — key to victory.  And, the Democrats have it and the Republicans don’t.  Community organizing is what the group Obama For America (now Organizing For Action) has done for the left in each election since 2008.  It is a well funded effort that identifies responsible, working, mainstream supporters and gives them an office to go to, phones to utilize, professional high quality materials to distribute, and it has the resources to capture the identifying information for these super-volunteers, and to warehouse and cull the data collected through their outreach efforts.  It does not close shop between elections.

That’s what conservatives and Republicans don’t have.  The party committees are not set up to do this kind of community organizing.  The Democrats know that to be true, which is why the left’s remarkable ground game effort was not housed with the DNC.  Organizing For Action (OFA) is a standalone operation.

Person to Person PAC (P2P) is the grassroots community organizing entity established to counter the Democrat’s Organizing For Action model.  P2P, like OFA, exists outside of the Party structure, with dedicated professional oversight, dedicated meeting space for volunteers, providing a consistent presence, and high quality materials and information, to super-volunteers looking for a reliable place to donate their valuable time.  It will provide mainstream, center-right conservatives with a place to turn their justified outrage over harmful policies and tone-deaf politicians into actions that will change elections and effect real change.

P2P PAC is looking to start well before the 2014 election cycle, by making a commitment in the Virginia gubernatorial race this November.

As the old saying goes, if you are not outraged you are not paying attention but I suspect you are outraged because you are paying attention.  Log on to Person to Person PAC.  Let us help you blow off some steam and make a difference for the cause.

Categories: Other Tags:

Et tu, Begich?

Weekly Clips May 16, through May 30, 2013

U.S. Sen. Mark Begich, D-AK

Et tu, Begich?

The Tundra Drums: ’ve been accused of growing up somewhat sheltered in terms of Alaska politics – I was raised in a little leftist bubble, you might say, that encompassed Bootlegger’s Cove, Chugach “Optional” Elementary School, and, that hotbed of young liberalism, Steller Secondary School.

I remember when then-city assemblyman Mark Begich visited the Steller auditorium to explain (somewhat sheepishly, I thought at the time) why he supported a new teen curfew inAnchorage. Begich, you see, was one of our own – Steller class of 1981 – so we all felt a little betrayed. It wasn’t that all teens were bad, I remember him saying, it was just that a curfew would let police officers stop the bad teens from being out late doing nefarious, perhaps gang-related, things. That would make everyone safer. If good teens were punished in the process, if the scope of what they were allowed to do was limited, that was just the unfortunate byproduct – basically, our freedom was being curtailed for everyone’s safety.

It was my first realization that even a sympathetic politician – even one of your own – will sometimes sell you out if it’s expedient for a higher goal. I was reminded of this when the votes on the Manchin-Toomey amendment came out.

I know Alaskans love their guns. We love our Second Amendment rights. In addition to being a red state overall, we have a healthy share of hunters, survivalists and Libertarian-minded individuals. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where we’d ever give up the right to possess enough firepower to hold off an invading army.

But many of the most ardent gun advocates also seem to think that if the FBI won’t let a person buy a gun at a shop due to, say, killing innocent people previously with guns, they shouldn’t be able to hit up a gun show with a credit card and brash impunity. That’s just inconsistent. It’s apparently not just my liberal bubble denizens that think so. A recent poll conducted by Public Policy Polling seems to indicate that many Alaskans – 60 percent, according to the poll – support expanded background checks.

That Lisa Murkowski voted the amendment down was no surprise. But Begich?

Begich, of course, is up for re-election soon, and I imagine he is feeling a little nervous about looking too blue for Alaska’s Republican-leaning constituents (not our majority, but the largest bloc of voters registered with any political party). When he spoke of his stance against the expanded background checks he said “there are common-sense things we can do to keep our communities safe, but we must do them without undermining our Second Amendment rights… Unfortunately the bill on the Senate floor today would have done just that.”

Perhaps Begich doesn’t believe he should vote yes on anything with even a whiff of gun control about it. Perhaps the NRA has him in their pocket. Perhaps he really believes what he says. Perhaps he’s just making sure that felons and the mentally ill retain their Second Amendment rights. I don’t know.

But when I was in high school, Begich told me that safety would have to be at the cost of freedom. Today, apparently, freedom must not be curtailed by safety. Both times I wondered what end he was working toward. It’s just the opposite, and more of the same.

Victoria Barber is the editor of the Anchorage Press, former editor of The Tundra Drums and the Seward Journal.


Tea Party’s Joe Miller: Off but running in Alaska

Juneau Empire: The controversial, ultraconservative Tea Party activist who upset Alaska’s Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the 2010 GOP primary, and then lost to Murkowski in the general election, has filed papers to run for the Senate in 2014.

Joe Miller has filed a Federal Election Commission form stating he intends to run against Democratic Sen. Mark Begich.  Given Miller’s low poll ratings, that’s potentially very good news for Begich.


Controversial Tea Party-backed Alaska Senate candidate Joe Miller.


The form, disclosed in Politico, states that the Fairbanks-based Miller plans to run for the Senate as a Republican, and that Citizens for Joe Miller in his campaign committee.  A more conventional Republican, Lt. Governor Sean Parnell (“lite governor” to the Alaska Ear column of the Anchorage Daily News) is also exploring the race.

Alaska is a very red state.  Yet, its fractious Republicans have fought over control of the state party.  Wasilla, Alaska, Mayor Sarah Palin upset incumbent Gov. Frank Murkowski in the 2006 GOP primary.  In 2010, Palin supported Miller against Lisa Murkowski, who was appointed by her father to the U.S. Senate.

Miller imploded in 2010 when his controversial views became known.  He wanted to phase out Medicare, privatize Social Security, wondered whether unemployment insurance was constitutional, and said he would not fight to bring federal dollars to Alaska.  A reporter critical of Miller was detained against his will by the candidate’s “security” detail.

Miller is serving up the same old red meat.  In an April letter to potential supporters, the Fairbanks lawyer declared:

“With the reelection of Barack Obama, our very way of self-government is in peril.  Though I was labeled an ‘extremist’ by the likes of Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich for telling the truth, both of our sitting senators now routinely engage in such ‘extremist’ rhetoric with respect to federal overreach, government spending and entitlement reform.”

Murkowski staged a comeback in 2010, becoming the first U.S. Senate candidate in 54 years to win in a write-in campaign.  Miller contested the write-in count every step of the way.

At least one Tea Party group has urged Palin to make the Senate race, prompting a wicked putdown from Sen. Murkowski, who implied that the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate no longer lives in the state.

A Republican pollster, Harper Polling, found in a survey earlier this month that 49 percent of those polled had an unfavorable opinion of Miller, while just 34 percent had a favorable opinion.  Seventeen percent had no opinion or had not heard of Miller.

Begich upset longtime (1969-2008) Republican Sen. Ted Stevens in 2008 by a 3,700-vote margin.  Stevens had been convicted of federal charges, having to do with payment for a remodel on his Girdwood, Alaska, home.  But the conviction was later vacated due to misconduct by Justice Department prosecutors.  Stevens was later killed in a light plane crash near Bristol Bay.


Zuckerberg’s Big Step Into Politics Is Pushing Tech Friends Away

San Francisco Gate: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s bipartisan political organization is losing friends.

The group backed by technology millionaires and billionaires, called, began advocating in April for changes to U.S. immigration law. Within weeks, surprised some of its members by setting up partisan offshoots and airing ads promoting Democratic Senator Mark Begich’s support for oil drilling and RepublicanSenator Lindsey Graham’s backing of the Keystone XL pipeline.

It’s a strategy intended to give political cover to some senators who may support an immigration bill by reminding uneasy voters of the lawmakers’ other policy priorities. Yet the tactic angered some pro-environment donors and sparked a social-media campaign against Zuckerberg.

“The right way to accomplish political objectives is to argue issues on the merits,” Elon Musk said in a telephone interview. The billionaire co-founder of PayPal and chairman of electric carmaker Tesla Motors Inc. stopped participating with earlier this month. “We want a political system that is less cynical over time, not more,” Musk said.

Technology entrepreneur Anil Dash, who declined to join the group, was more blunt, writing on his blog, “If we’re finally moving past our innocent, naive and idealistic lack of engagement with the actual dirty dealings of legislation, then let’s try to figure out how to do it without losing our souls.”

With the Senate planning to begin debate on immigration the week of June 10, the feuding with risks diluting the strength of and sapping energy from organizations seeking to promote the bill’s passage.


High Stakes


The stakes are high, as the technology industry for a decade has sought more temporary visas for skilled employees, saying there aren’t enough qualified Americans to do such jobs as software engineering. Labor unions dispute that, arguing that Silicon Valley companies want to deflate wages by importing cheaper workers.

Introducing in an April 11 essay in the Washington Post, Zuckerberg wrote that would focus on immigration and also help on issues such as improving science, technology, engineering and math teaching in schools and increasing funding for scientific research.

As a social-welfare group, isn’t required to reveal its donors and is limited in the amount of political work it can do. lists 36 founders and major contributors on its website, without disclosing how much money they’ve given or the group’s total budget.


Political Background


The backers are a who’s who of the digital age. Among them: Microsoft Corp. chairman Bill GatesLinkedIn Corp. executive chairman Reid HoffmanNetflix Inc. chief executive officer Reed HastingsYahoo! Inc. CEO Marissa Mayer andGoogle Inc. executive chairman Eric Schmidt.

Some of them are seasoned political contributors. Schmidt, for example, is a top donor to President Barack Obama and Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican and tech advocate.

Zuckerberg, 29, is newer to politics, having never written a check to Obama or any other federal candidate, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, based in Washington.

In April, the offshoots spent more than $1 million on a trio of TV commercials which aired for about a week in home states of senators.

In one TV spot, Graham, a South Carolina Republican, says he wants to build the Keystone pipeline to transport tar-sands oil from Canada. In another, a narrator reminds viewers that Begich, an Alaska Democrat, wants to drill for oil in a wildlife refuge. Neither commercial mentions immigration.


Tested Strategy


The Graham ad reflects a time-tested political strategy, said Haley Barbour, an adviser to’s Republican group and Mississippi’s former governor.

“It’s very appropriate to remind people of his judgment so that, as voters learn about immigration, they listen to him,” Barbour said in an interview. “It’s a proven concept, used in all kinds of advertising. And for good reason — it’s logical.”

Musk and another former donor,David Sacks, who founded business networking site Yammer Inc., concluded otherwise and quit Zuckerberg’s group. Sacks declined to comment through Yammer spokeswoman Belinda Wong.

At the time those ads were airing,’s Silicon Valley- based president Joe Green, was pitching other tech entrepreneurs for support. After having lunch with Green, Dash and Josh Miller, a founder of startup company Branch, both wrote online essays expressing their reservations.


Silicon Outrage


The group’s approach, “though pitched as ’pragmatic’ and ’smart’ by Beltway insiders, is typically only practiced by large pharmaceutical companies, gun manufacturers, and the like,” Miller wrote in an essay posted to the website

Venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has more sharply criticized, asking May 5 in a Twitter message why the the group was willing to “prostitute climate destruction & other values to get a few engineers hired & get immigration reform?”

Keith Rabois, a partner at Khosla Ventures, is a contributor to The company didn’t respond to requests for comment.

In addition to the Graham and Begich ads, Zuckerberg’s group is running radio and TV spots that emphasize the “tough” aspects of the immigration plan.


Limbaugh Ads


A minute-long ad airing now on the national talk-radio shows of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity begins: “Our immigration system is a joke, and the whole world knows it.”

It goes on to say that Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, andRepresentative Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, “are working on plans to change that. It all starts with real border security, more fencing, more manpower and high- tech surveillance.”

Of those ads, Rob Jesmer, the campaign manager, said, “There’s a lot of conversation about immigration happening on talk radio. We’d be foolish not to get our message out over that medium.”

Opponents of’s tactics recently started using some of the same social-media sites that made the group’s backers wealthy.

Some environmental and Democratic-leaning groups, including the Sierra Club,League of Conservation Voters, CREDO and have banded together to criticize through a Facebook page and Twitter account.


Tumblr Dance


The coalition created a Tumblr last week to take aim at Mayer — whose company just purchased that micro-publishing outlet for $1.1 billion.

“We’d like this Yahoo! gif better, and do this dance, if Marissa Mayer dropped,” the Tumblr concludes, showing a dancing animation.

“These are the people who should be helping us figure out how to have a better democracy, and yet they’re just using old, broken D.C. strategies,” said Becky Bond, political director of CREDO, a super-political action committee started by a mobile phone company. “They have built their careers on communities of millions of users. We just want to make sure those users know what they’re doing.”


–With assistance from Alan Ohnsman in Los Angeles. Editors: Jeanne Cummings, Robin Meszoly


To contact the reporter on this story: Julie Bykowicz in Washington at


To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jeanne Cummings at



Categories: Alaska politics Tags: